THE GLOBE AND MAIL, Thursday, July 14, 2005
This week marked the 10th anniversary of the United Nations' second greatest failure since its creation in 1945 -- the genocide in Rwanda being the undisputed No. 1. With much fanfare, the ceremonies focused on the massacre of "up to" 8,000 Bosnian men and boys by General Ratko Mladic's Bosnian Serb army in Srebrenica in July of 1995.
In the vast majority of recent media reports, the background and responsibilities for the disaster in Srebrenica were absent. Preferred was the simple explanation: a black and white event in which the Serbs were solely to blame.
As someone who played a modest role in some of the events preceding the
massacre, perhaps a little background will provide some context. In early
1993, after my release from the Canadian Forces, I was asked to appear
before a number of U.S. congressional committees dealing with Bosnia. A few
months earlier, my successor in the UN Protection Force, General Philippe
Morillon, had --against the advice of his UN masters -- bullied his way into
Srebrenica accompanied by a tiny contingent of Canadian soldiers and told
its citizens they were now under the protection of the UN. The folks at the
UN in New York were furious with Gen. Morillon but, with the media on his
side, they were forced to introduce the "safe haven" concept for six areas
of Bosnia, including Srebrenica.
Wondering what this concept would mean, one U.S. senator asked me how many
troops it would take to defend the safe havens. "Somewhere in the
neighbourhood of 135,000 troops," I replied. It had to be that large because
of the Serb artillery's range. The new UN commander on the ground in Bosnia,
Belgian General Francis Briquemont, said he agreed with my assessment but
was prepared to try to defend the areas with 65,000 additional troops. The
secretary-general of the day, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, went to the Security
Council and recommended 27,500 additional troops. The Security Council
approved a force of 12,000 and, six months later, fewer than 2,000
additional soldiers had been added to UNPROFOR for the safe-haven tasks.
Then the Security Council changed the wording of the safe-haven resolution
from "the UN will defend the safe havens" to "by their presence will the UN
deter attacks on the safe havens." In other words, a tiny, token, lightly
armed UN contingent would be placed as sacrificial lambs in Srebrenica to
"deter" the Bosnian Serb army.
It didn't take long for the Bosnian Muslims to realize that the UN was in no
position to live up to its promise to "protect" Srebrenica. With some help
from outsiders, they began to infiltrate thousands of fighters and weapons
into the safe haven. As the Bosnian Muslim fighters became better equipped
and trained, they started to venture outside Srebrenica, burning Serb
villages and killing their occupants before quickly withdrawing to the
security provided by the UN's safe haven. These attacks reached a crescendo
in 1994 and carried on into early 1995 after the Canadian infantry company
that had been there for a year was replaced by a larger Dutch contingent.
The Bosnian Serbs might have had the heaviest weapons, but the Bosnian
Muslims matched them in infantry skills that were much in demand in the
rugged terrain around Srebrenica. As the snow cleared in the spring of 1995,
it became obvious to Nasar Oric, the man who led the Bosnian Muslim
fighters, that the Bosnian Serb army was going to attack Srebrenica to stop
him from attacking Serb villages. So he and a large number of his fighters
slipped out of town. Srebrenica was left undefended with the strategic
thought that, if the Serbs attacked an undefended town, surely that would
cause NATO and the UN to agree that NATO air strikes against the Serbs were
justified. And so the Bosnian Serb army strolled into Srebrenica without
What happened next is only debatable in scale. The Bosnian Muslim men and
older boys were singled out and the elderly, women and children were moved
out or pushed in the direction of Tuzla and safety. It's a distasteful
point, but it has to be said that, if you're committing genocide, you don't
let the women go since they are key to perpetuating the very group you are
trying to eliminate. Many of the men and boys were executed and buried in
Evidence given at The Hague war crimes tribunal casts serious doubt on the
figure of "up to" 8,000 Bosnian Muslims massacred. That figure includes "up
to" 5,000 who have been classified as missing. More than 2,000 bodies have
been recovered in and around Srebrenica, and they include victims of the
three years of intense fighting in the area. The math just doesn't support
the scale of 8,000 killed.
Nasar Oric, the Bosnian Muslim military leader in Srebrenica, is currently
on trial in The Hague for war crimes committed during his "defence" of the
town. Evidence to date suggests that he was responsible for killing as many
Serb civilians outside Srebrenica as the Bosnian Serb army was for
massacring Bosnian Muslims inside the town.
Two wrongs never made a right, but those moments in history that shame us
all because of our indifference should not be viewed in isolation without
the context that created them.
Retired major-general Lewis MacKenzie was the first commander of UN
peacekeeping forces in Sarajevo.